The Secularization of Morality and the Emergence of Conscience: A Comparison between the Western and Arab Contexts

Volume 5|Issue 18| Autumn 2016 |Articles

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between religion, religiosity and morals. It highlights the deep differences between ancient and modern moral theories that can be summed up as follows: the first assumption is that modern morals are built on the basis of rules of conduct that govern individual behavior in opposite to ancient morals that seek for virtue as inclination to do good and for happiness as the ultimate end of the action. The second is that modern morals assume that a human being is able to figure out the meaning of moral rule without any help or external command from God or any other timeless or worldly authority.  This development has been the result of an intellectual process where the concept of conscience as inner motivation and free will held great importance. All this has required the recognition of individual freedom and the right of the subject to govern him/herself and to be the master of his/her own action. In contrast to this progress in the field of Western modern moral theories, and which has led to the secularization of values and norms of moral action, in the Arab context such progress in the same direction has not been seen. 

Download Article Download Issue Cite this Article Subscribe for a year Cite this Article

​Professor of Moral and Political Philosophy at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies. He published in French two books on the American philosopher John Rawls, Etudes rawlsiennes: contrat et justice (2006); Le juste et ses normes: John Rawls et le concept du politique (2007). He is also author of many articles and chapters of books published in Arabic, English and French. 

× Citation/Reference
Arab Center
Harvard
APA
Chicago